Researchers speaking at the International Congress on Law and Mental Health in Montreal have laid out how China’s forced organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners has now expanded to target Uyghurs, fuelled by two decades of international inertia and an industry worth an estimated nine billion dollars a year. From mandatory DNA sampling of 15 million people in Xinjiang to hospitals marketing “halal” transplants to Gulf states, the evidence keeps accumulating while legislative responses remain slow and largely toothless.
The Bodies That Vanish at Twenty-Eight
In concentration camps across China’s Xinjiang region, certain prisoners receive pink bracelets after routine blood tests. Shortly after, they disappear. They are almost always in their late twenties or early thirties, the precise age window when the human body has reached full maturity, but organs have not yet begun to decline.
This detail, shared by a witness who escaped China and recounted her experience to investigative journalist Ethan Gutmann, carries the weight of something the world has been refusing to look at for two decades. Forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience in China is not a rumour, not a fringe theory, and not a historical footnote. It is an active, expanding, industrialised system, and researchers speaking at the International Congress on Law and Mental Health in Montreal in early July 2026 laid out the evidence with forensic precision.
From Persecution to Procurement
The roots of this practice run back to 1999, when the Chinese Communist Party launched its campaign to eliminate Falun Gong. This spiritual discipline, grounded in principles of truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance, had grown rapidly through the 1990s. By the end of that decade, official state estimates placed the number of practitioners at somewhere between 70 and 100 million. That popularity itself became the threat. The CCP moved to crush it, and mass arrests followed.
What happened next inside China’s prison and detention system is what researchers David Matas and the late Canadian parliamentarian David Kilgour first brought to public attention in their 2006 report. Falun Gong practitioners, they argued, were being killed for their organs on a systematic basis. The practitioners did not drink or smoke, making them unusually healthy candidates. Many refused to identify themselves to protect their families, which meant their deaths could go entirely unrecorded. They became, in the most clinical sense, an invisible supply chain.
Maria Cheung, executive director of the Falun Gong Human Rights Group and professor emeritus at the University of Manitoba, told the Montreal conference that despite extensive advocacy efforts in the years that followed, the international response was painfully slow. That delay had consequences. The regime refined its methods, developed the supporting technology, and then found a second population to exploit.
The Uyghur Expansion
When China began detaining Uyghurs on a mass scale in Xinjiang, the infrastructure was already in place. Mehmet Tohti, director of Uyghur Rights Advocacy, described to the panel how the regime organised mandatory DNA sampling of more than 15 million people in the Xinjiang region. The stated purpose was never credible, and researchers believe the true function was organ matching on a population-wide scale.
As Muslims, Uyghurs do not drink alcohol, which made them attractive organ sources for a particular market. Chinese hospitals launched what Tohti described as a large marketing campaign targeting Gulf and Muslim countries, advertising transplants as “halal.” Hospitals were built or expanded across Xinjiang and elsewhere in China, some fitted with halal food services and prayer rooms specifically to attract patients from the Middle East. Fast-processing lanes for organ transport appeared at airports in Kashgar, Aksu, and Urumqi.
The International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China condemned the promotion of these so-called halal transplants in a 2021 statement, but the marketing continued. What was once a domestic atrocity had become an export product.
The Evidence That Keeps Accumulating
Conducting independent research inside China is close to impossible, so investigators have relied on converging lines of indirect and direct evidence to build a picture that has now been corroborated by multiple international inquiries.
China does not have a strong organ donation culture, yet the number of transplants performed in the country exploded after the 1999 persecution campaign began. Researchers have tracked the expansion of hospital beds dedicated to transplant procedures, the proliferation of transplant centres across the country, and wait times for matching organs that are staggeringly short. In some documented cases, patients have been told they could receive a matching organ within two weeks, a timeframe that is medically incomprehensible without access to a living bank of pre-tested donors.
Direct evidence has also surfaced. Hospital administrators in China admitted in recorded phone calls to providing organs sourced from Falun Gong practitioners. In 2024, a survivor who had parts of his lung and liver removed in a Chinese prison came forward publicly.
In 2019, the independent China Tribunal, chaired in London by Sir Geoffrey Nice (who previously led the prosecution of Slobodan Milošević), delivered its final judgment: forced organ harvesting had been conducted in China on a significant scale over many years, and Falun Gong practitioners were the primary source. The tribunal also noted that the medical testing of Uyghurs was more recent and that further evidence of harvesting from this group was likely to emerge.
It has.
Twenty Minutes into the Future
In April 1987, the American television series Max Headroom aired an episode called “Body Banks.” Set in a corporate dystopia whose tagline promised it was only “20 minutes into the future,” the episode followed the abduction of a young woman by two recurring criminals who made their living selling bodies to organ-harvesting banks. Tissue compatibility was tested on the spot. The organs were extracted for wealthy clients. The police could not be relied upon because, as one character put it, justice was cash flow.
Nearly four decades later, the scenario that seemed safely confined to cyberpunk satire is operating at industrial scale across a real country, with real airports fitted with fast-processing lanes for organ transport and real hospitals marketing their services internationally. The fiction imagined a world in which human beings could be reduced to biological inventory. The reality went further than the writers dared.
A Nine-Billion-Dollar Industry
The scale of what is being described here is not a series of isolated abuses. Estimates from researchers and investigators suggest that 60,000 to 100,000 transplant surgeries may be performed in China each year, vastly exceeding official figures. Ethan Gutmann has estimated that at least 25,000 Uyghurs may be killed annually for their organs. Jan Jekielek, senior editor at The Epoch Times and author of the 2026 book “Killed to Order,” has described an industry worth approximately nine billion dollars annually.
At a congressional hearing in Washington in May 2026, Representative Chris Smith called these atrocities comparable to Nazi-era crimes. Former U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback pointed to the impossibly short wait times in Chinese hospitals as evidence that defies any legitimate explanation. The hearing heard testimony that the CCP is conducting what amounts to three simultaneous religious genocides, targeting Tibetan Buddhists, Uyghur Muslims, and Falun Gong practitioners.
Legislation Without Teeth
Legislative responses have begun to emerge, though researchers at the Montreal conference expressed frustration at their limited practical effect. Canada passed Bill S-223 in 2022, criminalising involvement in forced organ harvesting and making those involved inadmissible for entry. But Tohti pointed out that the law lacks enforcement mechanisms, noting that a person could travel to China for a transplant and return without triggering any consequences.
In the United States, the House has twice passed legislation targeting forced organ harvesting, but the Senate has been slower to act. A bipartisan bill introduced in March 2026 by Senators Ted Cruz and Jeff Merkley seeks to impose sanctions on individuals involved in the practice and bar them from entering the country. The bill passed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously in June. Gutmann expressed cautious optimism that it will move forward.
But legislation alone does not end an atrocity this deeply embedded in state infrastructure. International pressure from medical associations has been inconsistent. The Transplantation Society, an international body headquartered in Montreal, initially took steps to prevent complicity (including barring Chinese surgeons from its events), but re-engaged with China after Beijing announced in 2015 that it would stop sourcing organs from executed prisoners. As Matas pointed out at the conference, Beijing never said it would stop sourcing organs from prisoners of conscience. The distinction is everything.
What Silence Permits
The trajectory of this issue is itself a lesson in what happens when credible evidence meets institutional inertia. Researchers first documented forced organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in 2006. Twenty years later, the practice has not stopped. It has expanded to encompass Uyghurs, and possibly others. The technology has improved. The supply chains have become more sophisticated. The marketing has gone international.
Each year that the world delays a meaningful response, the system entrenches further. Cheung’s observation at the Montreal conference carries a quiet gravity: the world’s slow response did not merely fail to prevent expansion. It enabled it.
There is a version of this story that belongs to geopolitics, to trade calculations, to the diplomatic cost of confronting a nuclear power. But there is also a version that belongs to something more fundamental: the question of whether a human being can be reduced to the sum of their transplantable parts, and whether the rest of the world will continue to look away while that reduction is carried out on an industrial scale.
The pink bracelets keep appearing. The twenty-eight-year-olds keep disappearing.
Original Article: Epoch Times
Join the Conversation
What responsibility do ordinary citizens carry when governments and international institutions have been this slow to act? And how do we reckon with the scale of what is happening here without becoming numb to it? Share your experiences and insights below.
